Home › Toolkits › What Is An Integrated Management System
Guide · for anyone holding more than one standard

What Is An Integrated Management System

One spine, several sets of ribs. What genuinely merges when you hold more than one standard, what has to stay apart, and the twelve-month audit programme that covers every standard in a single set of visits.

25page guide
4workbook sheets
A3one-page map

What is in it

The guide25 pages, thirteen sections

What integration actually means, what the harmonised structure gives you for free, the merged document set named document by document, what stays standard-specific and why, the twelve-month audit programme, one management review instead of three, and the business case in numbers.

The shared core, namedthirteen documents

From the integrated manual and combined policy statement through to document control, risk and opportunity, legal and other requirements, competence, communication, internal audit, management review, nonconformity, change management, monitoring and the integrated register workbook.

The twelve-month audit programme12 rows

You do not audit standards, you audit processes, and you check every standard that touches the process while you are standing there. One workshop visit closes out quality, environmental and safety at the same time.

IMS Integration Workbook4 sheets

Clause matrix mapping 46 rows across ISO 9001, 14001, 45001, 27001 and 42001. Document register with the thirteen core documents pre-filled and room for forty. Readiness check scoring twenty statements out of forty. Read me.

The Integrated Management System On One PageA3 PDF

Where the system touches fourteen business functions, the shared spine of clauses 4 to 10, the ribs each standard adds on top, and the order to build it in. Prints to A3, or to A4 at 71 per cent.

What makes it different

01It names the thirteen shared documents

Most explanations stop at "you can share some documents". This one lists the thirteen that make up the shared core, and the five things that have to stay standard-specific, with the reason each cannot be merged.

02It tells you what NOT to merge

The commonest integration mistake is the opposite of the one people expect. It is not failing to merge enough, it is merging things that should have stayed apart, usually risk assessments. One spreadsheet holding environmental aspects, workplace hazards and information security risks in the same columns serves none of them, and an auditor will say so.

03The business case has its ceiling attached

IAF MD 11 permits an audit time reduction for a genuinely integrated system and caps it at twenty per cent. That is a ceiling, not an entitlement, and it depends on how integrated you really are and how many standards each auditor is qualified for. Overstating it gets found out at the first invoice.

Who it is for

Anyone who already holds one standard and is being asked for a second, and anyone who has inherited three separate systems that were bolted together rather than integrated.

Drafted for the United Kingdom with notes for Scotland and Northern Ireland, and structured so that the management system requirements carry across unchanged to any jurisdiction. Outside the UK you would replace the legal register entries with your own obligations; everything else holds.

Format and licence

Fully editable Microsoft Word and Excel in one zip. Every placeholder is in [SQUARE BRACKETS] so you can see at a glance what needs your input. Every guidance box is shaded so you know what to delete before you issue the document.

You may use, edit, adapt and rebrand everything within your own organisation, on as many sites and for as many people as you employ, and give completed copies to your certification body, assessor, clients, insurer or regulator.

You may not resell, share or distribute the blank toolkit outside your organisation, or repackage it as your own product.

Questions

Is this a toolkit or a guide?
A guide with a workbook. It does not contain the policies and procedures themselves. It tells you which documents merge, which do not, and in what order to build them, so that you do not construct three systems and then try to staple them together.
Will integrating actually reduce our certification fee?
It can, and there is a hard ceiling. IAF MD 11, which every accredited certification body applies, permits a reduction for a genuinely integrated system that shall not exceed twenty per cent of the starting point. A bolted-on system audited by three separate specialists earns nothing.
We only hold one standard. Is this any use?
Honestly, not much yet. A single-standard company with eight people has nothing to integrate. It becomes worth reading the moment a second standard is on the table, which is usually when a client asks for one in a tender.